The Effect Of Independence, Professional Judgment, and Professional Ethics on Audit Quality with Integrity as a Moderating Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24903/obor.v8i2.4063Keywords:
Kualitas audit, Integritas, Independensi, Professional judgment, Etika profesiAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of Independence, Professional Judgment, and Professional Ethics on Audit Quality with Integrity as a moderating variable in Public Accounting Firm (KAP) auditors in Bandung. The background of this study is based on the importance of audit quality in increasing public trust in the public accounting profession, as well as the need for auditors to have an independent attitude, professional judgment, professional ethics, and integrity in carrying out audit assignments. The research method used is a quantitative method with an associative approach. The study population is auditors working at Public Accounting Firms in Bandung. The sampling technique used purposive sampling, resulting in 50 respondents as research samples. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with the help of the IBM SPSS Statistics program. Testing was carried out through validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, moderation regression analysis, coefficient of determination (R²) tests, F tests, and t tests. The results of the study indicate that Independence does not have a significant effect on Audit Quality, and Professional Judgment does not have a significant effect on Audit Quality. On the other hand, Professional Ethics and Integrity are proven to have a positive and significant effect on Audit Quality. The results of the moderating variable test indicate that Integrity is unable to moderate the relationship between Independence, Professional Judgment, and Professional Ethics on Audit Quality, so that Integrity plays a more independent role as a variable that has a direct influence on Audit Quality. In addition, the research model has an Adjusted R Square value of 0.820, which indicates that 82.0% of the variation in Audit Quality can be explained by the variables in the research model, while the remaining 18.0% is influenced by other factors outside the research.
References
Agoes, S. (2014). Auditing: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Akuntan Publik Edition: 5. Salemba Empat.
Apsari, P. A. , A. P. C. , & H. P. N. (2023). Independensi, Kompetensi Profesional dan Locus of Control dalam Mempengaruhi Kualitas Audit. https://doi.org/10.32795/hak.v4i2.3759
Arens, A. A. ; E. R. J. ; B. M. S. (2023). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach (17th Edition). Pearson.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006
Ghozali, I. (2015). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 24 (5th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Including International Independence Standards). International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants., (2020).
Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (Including International Independence Standards). International Federation of Accountants., (2020).
International Federation of Accountants. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Independensi, Mekanisme Corporate Governance, Dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Integritas Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis.
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 200: Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board., (2022).
International Standard on Auditing. (2023). (ISA) 200: Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. International Federation of Accountants.
Kurniasih, Margi. 2014. “Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit Tenure, dan Rotasi Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit pada perusahaan Go Public yang terdaftar di BEI”. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Mulyadi. (2016). Sistem Akuntansi. Salemba Empat.
Nuryaman, & Christina, V. (2015). Metodologi penelitian akuntansi dan bisnis: Teori dan praktik. Ghalia IndonesiaCode of Professional Conduct. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants., (2014).
Ramadhan, L. R. & A. (2020). Independensi, Integritas, Risk-Based Audit Sitasi APA 7th.
Rita Yuniarti, W. A. (2015). Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Independensi Auditor Internal Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, VII(1).
Riyanto, A., & Sulau, C. P. (2023). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Ratio Index. Jurnal Ekonomika: Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Perbankan Syari’ah, 12(1), 177–191. Retrieved from https://journal.uwgm.ac.id/ekonomika/article/view/1955
Robertus, A. N., & Wulan, K. S. (2021). The Effect of Internal Audit on Fraud Prevention (Case Study on Pt. X). Review of International Geographical Education Online.
SAP. (2011). Standar Akuntan Publik (SAP).
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1: Codification of Auditing Standards and Procedures (AU 110), AICPA (2020).
Syam, H. (n.d.). Auditing: Edisi Komprehensif Modern. Deepublish.
Tandiontong, R. (n.d.). Kualitas Audit dan Pengukurannya. Tirtabuanamedia.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (n.d.). Auditing Berbasis ISA.
Wedi Rusmawan Kusumah. (2022). Analysis Of Audit Quality Before And During Pandemic At Food & Baverages Company . Central Asia & the Caucasus.
